Argumen dari kesunyian

Argumen dari kesunyian (Latin: argumentum ex silentio) adalah sebuah argumen yang membuat suatu kesimpulan berdasarkan pada ketiadaan pernyataan dalam dokumen sejarah, alih-alih keberadaan mereka.^[2]^[3] Dalam bidang kajian klasik, istilah ini sering merujuk kepada anggapan bahwa seorang penulis dicap tidak mengetahui suatu hal hanya karena mereka tidak menyebutkannya di dalam tulisannya yang telah ditemukan.^[3]

Referensi

^ The Routledge Companion to Epistemology by Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard (2010) ISBN 0-415-96219-6 Routledge pp. 64–65 "arguments from silence are, as a rule, quite weak; there are many examples where reasoning from silence would lead us astray."
^ "argumentum e silentio noun phrase" The Oxford Essential Dictionary of Foreign Terms in English. Ed. Jennifer Speake. Berkley Books, 1999.
^ ^a ^b John Lange, The Argument from Silence, History and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 3 (1966), pp. 288–301 [1]

[Sven-1] The Routledge Companion to Epistemology by Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard (2010) ISBN 0-415-96219-6 Routledge pp. 64–65 "arguments from silence are, as a rule, quite weak; there are many examples where reasoning from silence would lead us astray."

[2] "argumentum e silentio noun phrase" The Oxford Essential Dictionary of Foreign Terms in English. Ed. Jennifer Speake. Berkley Books, 1999.

[JLange-3] John Lange, The Argument from Silence, History and Theory, Vol. 5, No. 3 (1966), pp. 288–301 [1]

[1]

[2]

[3]