Lompat ke isi

Hak asasi hewan: Perbedaan antara revisi

Dari Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia, ensiklopedia bebas
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
InternetArchiveBot (bicara | kontrib)
Rescuing 3 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8
InternetArchiveBot (bicara | kontrib)
Rescuing 5 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
(6 revisi perantara oleh 4 pengguna tidak ditampilkan)
Baris 17: Baris 17:


}}
}}
'''Hak asasi hewan''', juga dikenal sebagai '''kebebasan hewan''', adalah ide bahwa hak-hak dasar hewan non-manusia harus dianggap sederajat sebagaimana hak-hak dasar manusia.<ref>Wise, Steven M. [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9007642/animal-rights "Animal Rights"], ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
'''Hak asasi hewan''', juga dikenal sebagai '''kebebasan hewan''', adalah ide bahwa hak-hak dasar hewan non-manusia harus dianggap sederajat sebagaimana hak-hak dasar manusia.<ref>Wise, Steven M. [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9007642/animal-rights "Animal Rights"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081118132310/http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9007642/animal-rights |date=2008-11-18 }}, ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
* Also see Taylor, Angus. ''Animals & Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.</ref> Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakan [[proteksionisme hewan|proteksionis]] yang dicetuskan filsuf [[Peter Singer]]—dengan fokus [[utilitarianisme|utilitarian]] terhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, daripada konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakan [[abolisionisme (hak asasi hewan)|abolisionis]] yang dicetuskan profesor hukum [[Gary Francione]], yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai [[orang]] non-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.<ref>Taylor, Angus. ''Animals and Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
* Also see Taylor, Angus. ''Animals & Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.</ref> Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakan [[proteksionisme hewan|proteksionis]] yang dicetuskan filsuf [[Peter Singer]]—dengan fokus [[utilitarianisme|utilitarian]] terhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, alih-alih konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakan [[abolisionisme (hak asasi hewan)|abolisionis]] yang dicetuskan profesor hukum [[Gary Francione]], yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai [[orang]] non-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.<ref>Taylor, Angus. ''Animals and Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
* Also see [https://web.archive.org/web/20080506153652/http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/oct03/animalrights.htm "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human"], Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.
* Also see [https://web.archive.org/web/20080506153652/http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/oct03/animalrights.htm "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human"], Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.
* For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. ''The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?''. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by [[Gary Francione]] for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by [[Robert Garner]] for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.
* For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. ''The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?''. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by [[Gary Francione]] for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by [[Robert Garner]] for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.
Baris 29: Baris 29:
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Wikiquote}}
{{Refbegin|2}}
{{Refbegin|2}}
* [http://www.lclark.edu/org/animalaw/ ''Animal Law Review''], Lewis & Clark Law School, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.lclark.edu/org/animalaw/ ''Animal Law Review''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070206005626/http://www.lclark.edu/org/animalaw/ |date=2007-02-06 }}, Lewis & Clark Law School, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.nabranimallaw.org Animal Law section] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200311074931/http://www.nabranimallaw.org/ |date=2020-03-11 }}, The National Association for Biomedical Research, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.nabranimallaw.org Animal Law section] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200311074931/http://www.nabranimallaw.org/ |date=2020-03-11 }}, The National Association for Biomedical Research, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://aldf.org/article.php?id=446/ Animal Legal Defense Fund], accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://aldf.org/article.php?id=446/ Animal Legal Defense Fund] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111005013101/http://aldf.org/article.php?id=446%2F |date=2011-10-05 }}, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.animalrightshistory.org Animal rights history], animalrightshistory.org, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.animalrightshistory.org Animal rights history] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200427010546/http://www.animalrightshistory.org/ |date=2020-04-27 }}, animalrightshistory.org, accessed June 13, 2010.
* Regan, Tom. [http://www.vorlesungen-tierrechte.de/media/index.php?v=regan Video of "Animal Rights: An Introduction"], Interdisciplinary Lectures on Animal Rights, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, May 24, 2006, accessed June 13, 2010.
* Regan, Tom. [http://www.vorlesungen-tierrechte.de/media/index.php?v=regan Video of "Animal Rights: An Introduction"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070311142034/http://www.vorlesungen-tierrechte.de/media/index.php?v=regan |date=2007-03-11 }}, Interdisciplinary Lectures on Animal Rights, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, May 24, 2006, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.cala-online.org/ The Center on Animal Liberation Affairs], accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.cala-online.org/ The Center on Animal Liberation Affairs] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201022064752/http://www.cala-online.org/ |date=2020-10-22 }}, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/animalrights/ The Tom Regan Animal Rights archive], North Carolina State University, accessed June 13, 2010.
* [http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/animalrights/ The Tom Regan Animal Rights archive] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070416154518/http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/animalrights/ |date=2007-04-16 }}, North Carolina State University, accessed June 13, 2010.
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}
<br />
<br />

{{Veganisme dan Vegetarianisme}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hak Asasi Hewan}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hak Asasi Hewan}}
{{hukum-stub}}
[[Kategori:Hak asasi hewan| ]]
[[Kategori:Hak asasi hewan| ]]
[[Kategori:Bioetika]]
[[Kategori:Bioetika]]
[[Kategori:Gerakan politik]]
[[Kategori:Gerakan politik]]
[[Kategori:Hak asasi]]
[[Kategori:Kesejahteraan hewan]]
[[Kategori:Kesejahteraan hewan]]

[[Kategori:Hewan]]

{{hukum-stub}}

Revisi terkini sejak 13 Agustus 2023 02.49

Hak asasi hewan
Advokat hak asasi hewan menyatakan bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai orang, bukan benda.[1]
DeskripsiHewan adalah anggota dari komunitas moral.[2]
Pencetus awalJeremy Bentham (1748–1832)
Henry Salt (1851–1939)
Pencetus modernPeter Singer, Tom Regan,
Gary Francione
Teks kunciSalt's Animals' Rights (1894)
Singer's Animal Liberation (1972)
SubyekFilsafat, etika

Hak asasi hewan, juga dikenal sebagai kebebasan hewan, adalah ide bahwa hak-hak dasar hewan non-manusia harus dianggap sederajat sebagaimana hak-hak dasar manusia.[3] Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakan proteksionis yang dicetuskan filsuf Peter Singer—dengan fokus utilitarian terhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, alih-alih konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakan abolisionis yang dicetuskan profesor hukum Gary Francione, yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai orang non-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.[4]

Catatan kaki[sunting | sunting sumber]

  1. ^ See, for example, Francione, Gary. Animals as persons. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 1.
  2. ^ "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010; Taylor, Angus. Animals and Ethics, Broadview Press, 2003, pp 15ff.
  3. ^ Wise, Steven M. "Animal Rights" Diarsipkan 2008-11-18 di Wayback Machine., Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
    • Also see Taylor, Angus. Animals & Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.
  4. ^ Taylor, Angus. Animals and Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
    • Also see "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.
    • For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by Gary Francione for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by Robert Garner for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.
    • For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.). Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

Pranala luar[sunting | sunting sumber]