Makam kosong: Perbedaan antara revisi

← Revisi sebelumnya Revisi selanjutnya →

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan

Sebaris

Revisi per 15 Januari 2016 21.39

Dalam agama Kristen, makam kosong adalah makam Yesus yang ditemukan dalam keadaan kosong oleh para wanita yang dapat ke makamnya.^[1]

Kempat injil kanonikal mencatatkan insiden ini dengan berbagai signifikan.

Makam Yesus, dalam Church of the Holy Sepulchre, diperingati oleh sejumlah orang Kristen sebagai tempat pemakaman Yesus.

Makam kosong, sebagai simbol Kebangkitan, adalah gambaran terakhir pernyataan diri Yesus sebagai Tuhan.^[2]

Catatan Alkitab

Kebenaran sejarah

Salah seorang apologet Kristen yang membela doktrin utama kekristenan, William Lane Craig, menganalisis sumber-sumber, kesaksian para murid, termasuk Paulus, dan kitab-kitab Injil mengenai makam kosong, dan membuat ikhtisar kesimpulan berdasarkan kebenaran sejarah^[1]

Lihat pula

Kebangkitan Yesus
Minggu Sengsara
Bagian Alkitab yang berkaitan: Matius 28, Markus 16, Lukas 24, Yohanes 20

Referensi

^ ^a ^b Craig, William Lane. "The Historicity of the Empty Tomb of Jesus". [1] Accessed 1 Apr 2013
^ http://www.pemudakristen.com/artikel/bukti_kubur_kosong.php

[Craig-1] Craig, William Lane. "The Historicity of the Empty Tomb of Jesus". [1] Accessed 1 Apr 2013

[2] ttp://www.pemudakristen.com/artikel/bukti_kubur_kosong.php

[1]

[2]

@@ Baris 1: / Baris 1: @@
 [[File:PericopesHenryIIFol117rAngelOnTomb.jpg|thumb]]
-Dalam agama Kristen, '''makam kosong''' adalah [[makam Yesus]] yang ditemukan dalam keadaan kosong oleh para wanita yang dapat ke makamnya.
+Dalam agama Kristen, '''makam kosong''' adalah [[makam Yesus]] yang ditemukan dalam keadaan kosong oleh para wanita yang dapat ke makamnya.<ref name=Craig>Craig, William Lane. "The Historicity of the Empty Tomb of Jesus". [http://www.reasonablefaith.org/the-historicity-of-the-empty-tomb-of-jesus] Accessed 1 Apr 2013</ref>
 Kempat [[injil kanonikal]] mencatatkan insiden ini dengan berbagai signifikan.
+[[File:5267-20080122-jerusalem-tomb-of-jesus.jpg|thumb|right|Makam Yesus, dalam [[Church of the Holy Sepulchre]], diperingati oleh sejumlah orang Kristen sebagai tempat pemakaman Yesus.]]
 Makam kosong, sebagai simbol Kebangkitan, adalah gambaran terakhir pernyataan diri Yesus sebagai Tuhan.<ref>http://www.pemudakristen.com/artikel/bukti_kubur_kosong.php</ref>
+== Catatan Alkitab ==
+=== Injil Matius ===
+[[Matius 28]]
+=== Injil Markus ===
+[[Markus 16]]
+=== Injil Lukas ===
+[[Lukas 24]]
+=== Injil Yohanes ===
+[[Yohanes 20]]
+<!--== Catatan di luar Alkitab ==
+=== Injil Petrus ===-->
+== Kebenaran sejarah ==
+Salah seorang [[apologet Kristen]] yang membela doktrin utama [[kekristenan]], [[William Lane Craig]], menganalisis sumber-sumber, kesaksian para murid, termasuk [[Paulus dari Tarsus|Paulus]], dan kitab-[[kitab Injil]] mengenai makam kosong, dan membuat ikhtisar kesimpulan berdasarkan kebenaran sejarah<!-- sebagai berikut:--><ref name=Craig/>
+<!--
+#''Paul's testimony implies the historicity of the empty tomb.'' Had the tomb not been empty, then Christian theology would have taken an  entirely different route than it did, trying to explain how resurrection could  still be possible, though the body remained in the grave. But neither Christian  theology nor apologetics ever had to face such a problem.
+#''The presence of the empty tomb pericope in the pre-Markan passion story supports its historicity.'' Geographical references, personal names, and the use of Galilee as a horizon all  point to Jerusalem as the fount of the pre-Markan passion story.
+#''The use of 'the first day of the week' instead of 'on the third day' points  to the primitiveness of the tradition.'' the proximity of the tradition to the events themselves makes it idle to regard  the empty tomb as a legend. It makes it highly probable that on the first day of  the week the tomb was indeed found empty.
+#''The nature of the narrative itself is theologically unadorned and  nonapologetic.''  Very often contemporary theologians urge that the empty tomb is not a  historical proof for the resurrection because for the disciples it was in itself  ambiguous and not a proof. But that is precisely why the empty tomb story is  today so credible: because it was not an apologetic device of early Christians.
+#''The discovery of the tomb by women is highly probable.'' Given the low  status of women in Jewish society and their lack of qualification to serve as  legal witnesses, the most plausible explanation, in light of the  gospels' conviction that the disciples were in Jerusalem over the weekend, why  women and not the male disciples were made discoverers of the empty tomb is that  the women were in fact the ones who made this discovery. (This line of argument and others is disputed by Biblical scholar [[Bart_D._Ehrman|Bart Ehrman]].) <ref>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/04/19/do-we-know-if-there-was-an-empty-tomb.html</ref>
+#''The investigation of the empty tomb by the disciples is historically  probable.'' Behind the fourth gospel stands the Beloved Disciple, whose  reminiscences fill out the traditions employed. The visit of the disciples to  the empty tomb is therefore attested not only in tradition but by this disciple.
+#''It would have been impossible for the disciples to proclaim the resurrection  in Jerusalem had the tomb not been empty.'' The empty tomb is a ''sine qua  non'' of the resurrection. The fact that the Christian fellowship, founded on belief in Jesus'  resurrection, could come into existence and flourish in the very city where he  was executed and buried seems to be compelling evidence for the historicity of  the empty tomb.
+#''The Jewish polemic presupposes the empty tomb.'' The fact that the Jewish polemic never denied that Jesus' tomb was empty, but  only tried to explain it away is compelling evidence that the tomb was in fact empty.
+-->
+== Lihat pula ==
+* [[Kebangkitan Yesus]]
+* [[Minggu Sengsara]]
+* Bagian [[Alkitab]] yang berkaitan: [[Matius 28]], [[Markus 16]], [[Lukas 24]], [[Yohanes 20]]
 ==Referensi==
 {{Reflist}}