Hak asasi hewan: Perbedaan antara revisi

Hak asasi hewan
Hak asasi hewan
	Advokat hak asasi hewan menyatakan bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai orang, bukan benda.
Deskripsi	Hewan adalah anggota dari komunitas moral.
Pencetus awal	Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832); Henry Salt (1851–1939)
Pencetus modern	Peter Singer, Tom Regan,; Gary Francione
Teks kunci	Salt's Animals' Rights (1894); Singer's Animal Liberation (1972)
Subyek	Filsafat, etika

Jelajahi riwayat secara interaktif

← Revisi sebelumnya Revisi selanjutnya →

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan

VisualTeks wiki

Sebaris

Revisi per 11 Agustus 2022 16.35

Hak asasi hewan, juga dikenal sebagai kebebasan hewan, adalah ide bahwa hak-hak dasar hewan non-manusia harus dianggap sederajat sebagaimana hak-hak dasar manusia.^[3] Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakan proteksionis yang dicetuskan filsuf Peter Singer—dengan fokus utilitarian terhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, alih-alih konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakan abolisionis yang dicetuskan profesor hukum Gary Francione, yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai orang non-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.^[4]

Catatan kaki

^ See, for example, Francione, Gary. Animals as persons. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 1.
^ "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010; Taylor, Angus. Animals and Ethics, Broadview Press, 2003, pp 15ff.
^
Wise, Steven M. "Animal Rights", Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
- Also see Taylor, Angus. Animals & Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.
^
Taylor, Angus. Animals and Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
- Also see "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.
- For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by Gary Francione for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by Robert Garner for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.
- For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.). Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

Pranala luar

Animal Law Review, Lewis & Clark Law School, accessed June 13, 2010.
Animal Law section Diarsipkan 2020-03-11 di Wayback Machine., The National Association for Biomedical Research, accessed June 13, 2010.
Animal Legal Defense Fund Diarsipkan 2011-10-05 di Wayback Machine., accessed June 13, 2010.
Animal rights history, animalrightshistory.org, accessed June 13, 2010.
Regan, Tom. Video of "Animal Rights: An Introduction", Interdisciplinary Lectures on Animal Rights, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, May 24, 2006, accessed June 13, 2010.
The Center on Animal Liberation Affairs, accessed June 13, 2010.
The Tom Regan Animal Rights archive, North Carolina State University, accessed June 13, 2010.

Artikel bertopik hukum ini adalah sebuah rintisan. Anda dapat membantu Wikipedia dengan mengembangkannya.

[1] See, for example, Francione, Gary. Animals as persons. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. 1.

[lead-2] "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010; Taylor, Angus. Animals and Ethics, Broadview Press, 2003, pp 15ff.

[3] Wise, Steven M. "Animal Rights", Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
Also see Taylor, Angus. Animals & Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.

[4] Also see Taylor, Angus. Animals & Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.

[4] Taylor, Angus. Animals and Ethics. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
Also see "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.

For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by Gary Francione for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by Robert Garner for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.

For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.). Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

[6] Also see "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human", Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.

[7] For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by Gary Francione for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by Robert Garner for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.

[8] For an argument against animals as property, see, for example, Steiner, Gary. Foreword in Gary Francione (ed.). Animals as persons: essays on the abolition of animal exploitation. Columbia University Press, 2008, p. ix ff.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

@@ Baris 18: / Baris 18: @@
 }}
 '''Hak asasi hewan''', juga dikenal sebagai '''kebebasan hewan''', adalah ide bahwa hak-hak dasar hewan non-manusia harus dianggap sederajat sebagaimana hak-hak dasar manusia.<ref>Wise, Steven M. [http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9007642/animal-rights "Animal Rights"], ''Encyclopædia Britannica'', 2007, accessed May 17, 2010.
-* Also see Taylor, Angus. ''Animals & Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.</ref> Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakan [[proteksionisme hewan|proteksionis]] yang dicetuskan filsuf [[Peter Singer]]—dengan fokus [[utilitarianisme|utilitarian]] terhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, daripada konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakan [[abolisionisme (hak asasi hewan)|abolisionis]] yang dicetuskan profesor hukum [[Gary Francione]], yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai [[orang]] non-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.<ref>Taylor, Angus. ''Animals and Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
+* Also see Taylor, Angus. ''Animals & Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15 ff, and in particular p. 16.</ref> Para pendukung mendekati masalah ini dari posisi filosofis yang berbeda, mulai dari gerakan [[proteksionisme hewan|proteksionis]] yang dicetuskan filsuf [[Peter Singer]]—dengan fokus [[utilitarianisme|utilitarian]] terhadap penderitaan dan konsekuensi, alih-alih konsep hak itu sendiri—sampai gerakan [[abolisionisme (hak asasi hewan)|abolisionis]] yang dicetuskan profesor hukum [[Gary Francione]], yang menyatakan bahwa hewan hanya butuh satu hak, yaitu hak untuk tidak dijadikan benda atau properti. Meski ada berbagai macam pendekatan, mereka semua setuju bahwa hewan harus dipandang sebagai [[orang]] non-manusia dan anggota komunitas moral, serta tidak digunakan sebagai makanan, pakaian, subjek penelitian, atau hiburan.<ref>Taylor, Angus. ''Animals and Ethics''. Broadview Press, 2003, p. 15ff.
 * Also see [https://web.archive.org/web/20080506153652/http://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/oct03/animalrights.htm "'Personhood' Redefined: Animal Rights Strategy Gets at the Essence of Being Human"], Association of American Medical Colleges, retrieved May 17, 2010.
 * For the two sides of the movement, see Francione, Gary L. and Garner, Robert. ''The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation?''. Columbia University Press, 2010; in particular see "The Abolition of Animal Exploitation" by [[Gary Francione]] for the abolitionist position (p. 1ff) and "A Defense of a Broad Animal Protectionism" by [[Robert Garner]] for the protectionist position (p. 103ff). A debate between Francione and Garner can be found on p. 175ff.