Opini nasihat Mahkamah Internasional perihal deklarasi kemerdekaan Kosovo: Perbedaan antara revisi
Tampilan
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
.... |
|||
Baris 9: | Baris 9: | ||
| citations = [http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&code=kos&case=141&k=21 Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)] |
| citations = [http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&code=kos&case=141&k=21 Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)] |
||
| transcripts = |
| transcripts = |
||
| judges = [[Hisashi Owada]] (Presiden), [[Peter Tomka]] (Wakil Presiden), [[Abdul G. Koroma]], [[Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh]], [[Thomas Buergenthal]], [[Bruno Simma]], [[Ronny Abraham]], [[Kenneth Keith]], [[Bernardo Sepúlveda Amor]], [[Mohamed Bennouna]], [[Leonid Skotnikov]], [[Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade]], [[Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf]], [[Christopher Greenwood]] |
| judges = [[Hisashi Owada]] (Presiden), [[Peter Tomka]] (Wakil Presiden), [[Abdul G. Koroma]], [[Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh]], [[Thomas Buergenthal]], [[Bruno Simma]], [[Ronny Abraham]], [[Kenneth Keith]], [[Bernardo Sepúlveda Amor]], [[Mohamed Bennouna]], [[Leonid Skotnikov]], [[Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade]], [[Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf]], [[Christopher Greenwood]] |
||
| prior actions = |
| prior actions = |
||
| subsequent actions = |
| subsequent actions = |
||
| opinions = Deklarasi Kosovo tak mencederai hukum internasional (10–4) |
| opinions = Deklarasi Kosovo tak mencederai hukum internasional (10–4) |
||
}} |
}} |
||
''''' |
'''''Kesesuaian Deklarasi Kemerdekaan Sepihak Kosovo dengan Hukum Internasional''''' adalah sebuah [[opini nasihat]] yang dikeluarkan oleh [[Mahkamah Internasional]]. Permohonan untuk mengeluarkan opini ini dilayangkan oleh oleh [[Majelis Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa]] terkait dengan [[deklarasi kemerdekaan Kosovo 2008]]. Wilayah [[Kosovo]] menjadi bahan persengketaan antara [[Serbia]] dan Republik Kosovo yang didirikan oleh deklarasi tersebut. Ini adalah perkara pertama di Mahkamah Internasional yang berkaitan dengan [[deklarasi kemerdekaan]] sepihak. |
||
== Referensi == |
|||
{{reflist|2}} |
|||
== Pranala luar == |
== Pranala luar == |
Revisi per 2 Februari 2019 23.27
Perjanjian Hukum Internasional Deklarasi Kemerdekaan Unilateral Dalam Menghormati Kosovo | |
---|---|
Pengadilan | Mahkamah Internasional |
Nama lengkap perkara | Perjanjian Hukum Internasional Deklarasi Kemerdekaan Unilateral Dalam Menghormati Kosovo (Permintaan untuk Opini nasihat) |
Diputuskan | 22 Juli 2010 |
Sitasi | Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion) |
Opini atas perkara | |
Deklarasi Kosovo tak mencederai hukum internasional (10–4) | |
Majelis hakim | |
Hakim anggota majelis | Hisashi Owada (Presiden), Peter Tomka (Wakil Presiden), Abdul G. Koroma, Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh, Thomas Buergenthal, Bruno Simma, Ronny Abraham, Kenneth Keith, Bernardo Sepúlveda Amor, Mohamed Bennouna, Leonid Skotnikov, Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade, Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, Christopher Greenwood |
Kesesuaian Deklarasi Kemerdekaan Sepihak Kosovo dengan Hukum Internasional adalah sebuah opini nasihat yang dikeluarkan oleh Mahkamah Internasional. Permohonan untuk mengeluarkan opini ini dilayangkan oleh oleh Majelis Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa terkait dengan deklarasi kemerdekaan Kosovo 2008. Wilayah Kosovo menjadi bahan persengketaan antara Serbia dan Republik Kosovo yang didirikan oleh deklarasi tersebut. Ini adalah perkara pertama di Mahkamah Internasional yang berkaitan dengan deklarasi kemerdekaan sepihak.
Pranala luar
- United Nations General Assembly Session 63 Resolution 3. A/RES/63/3
- Introductory Note (PDF), International Court of Justice, 23 April 2009
- Advisory Opinion; summary of the Advisory Opinion: archived copy of the documents from the official International Court of Justice website
- International Court of Justice records of this case
- The Kosovo Crisis in an International Law Perspective: Self-determination, Territorial Integrity and the NATO Intervention North Atlantic Treaty Organization Office of Information and Press
- Symposium: Kosovo in the ICJ, German Law Journal (Vol. 11, no. 8, 2010)
- Symposium: The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Kosovo, Leiden Journal of International Law (Vol. 24, issue 1, 2011)
- Agora: The ICJ’s Kosovo Advisory Opinion, Americal Journal of International Law (Vol. 105, no. 1, January 2011)
- Current Developments in International Law: Kosovo, Göettingen Journal of International Law (Vol. 2, No. 3, 2010)
- The International Court of Justice and Kosovo: Opinion or Non-Opinion?, The Hague Justice Portal (2010-09-28)
- Argumen lisan
- Transcript of arguments made on Wednesday, 2 Dec., by the representatives of Albania, Saudi Arabia, Germany and Argentina
- Transcript of arguments made on Thursday, 3 Dec., by the representatives of Austria, Bahrain, Azerbaijan and Belarus
- Transcript of arguments made on Friday, 4 Dec., by the representatives of Bolivia, Brazil, Burundi and Bulgaria
- Transcript of arguments made on Monday, 7 Dec., by the representatives of China, Cyprus, Croatia and Denmark
- Transcript of arguments made on Tuesday, 8 Dec., by the representatives of Russia, Spain, U.S., and Finland
- Transcript of arguments made on Wednesday, 9 Dec., by the representatives of France, Norway and Jordan
- Transcript of arguments made on Thursday, 10 Dec., by the representatives of the Netherlands, Romania, and the United Kingdom
- Transcript of arguments made on Friday, 11 Dec., by the representatives of Venezuela and Vietnam