Peringkat Akademik Universitas Dunia: Perbedaan antara revisi
Text added |
Rescuing 8 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6 |
||
Baris 11: | Baris 11: | ||
'''Peringkat Akademik Universitas Dunia''' atau '''Academic Ranking of World Universities''' ('''ARWU'''), sering juga disebut '''Peringkat Shanghai''' (Shanghai Ranking), adalah salah satu publikasi tahunan [[Peringkat perguruan tinggi dan universitas|peringkat universitas]] dunia. Daftar peringkat ARWU pada awalnya disusun dan dikeluarkan oleh [[Universitas Jiao Tong Shanghai]] pada tahun 2003, menjadikannya sebagai daftar peringkat universitas global pertama dengan berbagai indikator.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Global university rankings - a comparative analysis|last=Pavel|first=Adina-Petruta|journal=Procedia Economics and Finance|volume=26|pages=54–63|doi=10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2|year=2015|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=theguardian>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/sep/10/university-rankings-influence-government-policy|title=World university rankings: how much influence do they really have?|newspaper=The Guardian|date=2013|access-date=27 January 2015|quote=The first international rankings, the Academic Ranking of World Universities or Shanghai Rankings}}</ref> |
'''Peringkat Akademik Universitas Dunia''' atau '''Academic Ranking of World Universities''' ('''ARWU'''), sering juga disebut '''Peringkat Shanghai''' (Shanghai Ranking), adalah salah satu publikasi tahunan [[Peringkat perguruan tinggi dan universitas|peringkat universitas]] dunia. Daftar peringkat ARWU pada awalnya disusun dan dikeluarkan oleh [[Universitas Jiao Tong Shanghai]] pada tahun 2003, menjadikannya sebagai daftar peringkat universitas global pertama dengan berbagai indikator.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Global university rankings - a comparative analysis|last=Pavel|first=Adina-Petruta|journal=Procedia Economics and Finance|volume=26|pages=54–63|doi=10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2|year=2015|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=theguardian>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/sep/10/university-rankings-influence-government-policy|title=World university rankings: how much influence do they really have?|newspaper=The Guardian|date=2013|access-date=27 January 2015|quote=The first international rankings, the Academic Ranking of World Universities or Shanghai Rankings}}</ref> |
||
Sejak 2009, daftar peringkat ARWU telah diterbitkan setiap tahunnya dan dilindungi hak cipta oleh Shanghai Ranking Consultancy, sebuah organisasi yang berfokus pada pendidikan tinggi dan secara hukum tidak tunduk serta tidak terikat kepada universitas atau lembaga pemerintah mana pun.<ref name="about">{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html|title=About Academic Ranking of World Universities|date=2014|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|access-date=26 September 2014|quote=Since 2009 the Academic Ranking of World Universities has been published and copyrighted by ShanghaiRanking Consultancy.}}</ref> Pada tahun 2011, dewan penasihat internasional yang terdiri dari para sarjana dan peneliti kebijakan dibentuk untuk memberikan saran.<ref name="ABSCBN">{{cite web|url=http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/08/12/10/shanghai-rankings-rattle-european-universities|title=Shanghai rankings rattle European universities|date=8 December 2010|publisher=ABS-CBN Interactive|access-date=27 January 2015|quote=France's higher education minister travelled to Jiaotong University's suburban campus last month to discuss the rankings, the Norwegian education minister came last year and the Danish minister is due to visit next month.; The idea for the rankings was born in 1998, when Beijing decreed China needed several world-leading universities.}}</ref><ref name="ARWUconsultants">{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutiab.html|title=ARWU International Advisory Board|date=2014|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|access-date=27 January 2015}}</ref> Daftar ARWU saat ini mencakup daftar peringkat institusi pendidikan tinggi global secara keseluruhan dan untuk pilihan mata pelajaran individu, selain itu ada juga daftar "Peringkat Tiongkok Raya" dan "Peringkat HEI Makedonia" regional independen. |
Sejak 2009, daftar peringkat ARWU telah diterbitkan setiap tahunnya dan dilindungi hak cipta oleh Shanghai Ranking Consultancy, sebuah organisasi yang berfokus pada pendidikan tinggi dan secara hukum tidak tunduk serta tidak terikat kepada universitas atau lembaga pemerintah mana pun.<ref name="about">{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html|title=About Academic Ranking of World Universities|date=2014|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|access-date=26 September 2014|quote=Since 2009 the Academic Ranking of World Universities has been published and copyrighted by ShanghaiRanking Consultancy.|archive-date=2021-02-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228035247/http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref> Pada tahun 2011, dewan penasihat internasional yang terdiri dari para sarjana dan peneliti kebijakan dibentuk untuk memberikan saran.<ref name="ABSCBN">{{cite web|url=http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/lifestyle/08/12/10/shanghai-rankings-rattle-european-universities|title=Shanghai rankings rattle European universities|date=8 December 2010|publisher=ABS-CBN Interactive|access-date=27 January 2015|quote=France's higher education minister travelled to Jiaotong University's suburban campus last month to discuss the rankings, the Norwegian education minister came last year and the Danish minister is due to visit next month.; The idea for the rankings was born in 1998, when Beijing decreed China needed several world-leading universities.}}</ref><ref name="ARWUconsultants">{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutiab.html|title=ARWU International Advisory Board|date=2014|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|access-date=27 January 2015|archive-date=2015-02-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150211033813/http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutiab.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref> Daftar ARWU saat ini mencakup daftar peringkat institusi pendidikan tinggi global secara keseluruhan dan untuk pilihan mata pelajaran individu, selain itu ada juga daftar "Peringkat Tiongkok Raya" dan "Peringkat HEI Makedonia" regional independen. |
||
ARWU dianggap sebagai salah satu dari tiga pemeringkat universitas yang paling berpengaruh dan diamati secara luas, di samping ''[[QS World University Rankings]]'' dan ''[[Times Higher Education World University Rankings]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://qswownews.com/history-development-higher-education-ranking-systems/|title=The history and development of higher education ranking systems - QS WOWNEWS|last=Network|first=QS Asia News|date=2018-03-02|work=QS WOWNEWS|access-date=2018-03-29|archive-date=2018-08-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821112252/https://qswownews.com/history-development-higher-education-ranking-systems/|dead-url=yes}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html|title=About Academic Ranking of World Universities {{!}} About ARWU|website=www.shanghairanking.com|access-date=2018-03-29}}</ref><ref name="New world university ranking puts Harvard back on top">{{cite journal|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0916/New-world-university-ranking-puts-Harvard-back-on-top|title=New world university ranking puts Harvard back on top|journal=Christian Science Monitor|author=Ariel Zirulnick|quote=Those two, as well as Shanghai Jiao Tong University, produce the most influential international university rankings out there|date=2010-09-16}}</ref><ref name="edmont">{{cite news|title=Top schools don't always get top marks |author=Indira Samarasekera & Carl Amrhein |newspaper=The Edmonton Journal |url=https://edmontonjournal.com/news/schools+always+marks/3560240/story.html |quote=There are currently three major international rankings that receive widespread commentary: The Academic World Ranking of Universities, the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education Rankings. |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101003203348/http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/schools%2Balways%2Bmarks/3560240/story.html |archive-date=October 3, 2010 }}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach|title=The State of the Rankings|website=Inside Higher Ed|author=Philip G. Altbach|date=11 November 2010|access-date=27 January 2015|quote=The major international rankings have appeared in recent months — the Academic Ranking of World Universities, the QS World University Rankings, and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE).}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nst.com.my/news/2016/09/172958/strength-and-weakness-varsity-rankings|title=Strength and weakness of varsity rankings|date=2016-09-14|work=NST Online|access-date=2018-03-29}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/9584155/University-rankings-which-world-university-rankings-should-we-trust.html|title=University rankings: which world university rankings should we trust?|journal=Daily Telegraph|last=Marszal|first=Andrew|date=2012-10-04|access-date=2018-03-29|issn=0307-1235}}</ref> ARWU banyak menerima [[umpan balik]] positif untuk objektivitas dan metodologinya,<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> tetapi menuai kritik luas karena gagal menyesuaikan dengan ukuran institusi, sehingga institusi pendidikan yang lebih besar cenderung menempati peringkat di atas yang lebih kecil.<ref name="edmont" /><ref name="EU">{{cite web|url=http://lajeunepolitique.com/2013/08/29/shanghai-academic-ranking-a-french-controversy/ |title="Shanghai Academic Ranking: a French Controversy" by Marc Goetzmann, for ''La Jeune Politique'' |publisher=Lajeunepolitique.com |date=29 August 2013 |access-date=9 June 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150109003645/http://lajeunepolitique.com/2013/08/29/shanghai-academic-ranking-a-french-controversy/ |archive-date=9 January 2015 }}</ref><ref name="HEPI">{{cite web|url=http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hepi_International-university-rankings-For-good-or-for-ill-REPORT-89-10_12_16_Screen.pdf|title=International university rankings: For good or ill?|author=Bahram Bekhradnia |publisher=Higher Education Policy Institute|date=15 December 2016|access-date=10 June 2017|quote =ARWU presents a further data issue. Whereas in the case of the other rankings the results are adjusted to take account of the size of institutions, hardly any such adjustment is made by ARWU. So there is a distortion in favour of large institutions. If two institutions were to merge, the very fact of merger would mean that the merged institution would do nearly twice as well as either of the individual institutions prior to merger, although nothing else had changed.|page=16}}</ref> |
ARWU dianggap sebagai salah satu dari tiga pemeringkat universitas yang paling berpengaruh dan diamati secara luas, di samping ''[[QS World University Rankings]]'' dan ''[[Times Higher Education World University Rankings]]''.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://qswownews.com/history-development-higher-education-ranking-systems/|title=The history and development of higher education ranking systems - QS WOWNEWS|last=Network|first=QS Asia News|date=2018-03-02|work=QS WOWNEWS|access-date=2018-03-29|archive-date=2018-08-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180821112252/https://qswownews.com/history-development-higher-education-ranking-systems/|dead-url=yes}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html|title=About Academic Ranking of World Universities {{!}} About ARWU|website=www.shanghairanking.com|access-date=2018-03-29|archive-date=2021-02-28|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228035247/http://www.shanghairanking.com/aboutarwu.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref><ref name="New world university ranking puts Harvard back on top">{{cite journal|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2010/0916/New-world-university-ranking-puts-Harvard-back-on-top|title=New world university ranking puts Harvard back on top|journal=Christian Science Monitor|author=Ariel Zirulnick|quote=Those two, as well as Shanghai Jiao Tong University, produce the most influential international university rankings out there|date=2010-09-16}}</ref><ref name="edmont">{{cite news|title=Top schools don't always get top marks |author=Indira Samarasekera & Carl Amrhein |newspaper=The Edmonton Journal |url=https://edmontonjournal.com/news/schools+always+marks/3560240/story.html |quote=There are currently three major international rankings that receive widespread commentary: The Academic World Ranking of Universities, the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education Rankings. |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101003203348/http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/schools%2Balways%2Bmarks/3560240/story.html |archive-date=October 3, 2010 }}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/altbach|title=The State of the Rankings|website=Inside Higher Ed|author=Philip G. Altbach|date=11 November 2010|access-date=27 January 2015|quote=The major international rankings have appeared in recent months — the Academic Ranking of World Universities, the QS World University Rankings, and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE).}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite news|url=https://www.nst.com.my/news/2016/09/172958/strength-and-weakness-varsity-rankings|title=Strength and weakness of varsity rankings|date=2016-09-14|work=NST Online|access-date=2018-03-29}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/9584155/University-rankings-which-world-university-rankings-should-we-trust.html|title=University rankings: which world university rankings should we trust?|journal=Daily Telegraph|last=Marszal|first=Andrew|date=2012-10-04|access-date=2018-03-29|issn=0307-1235}}</ref> ARWU banyak menerima [[umpan balik]] positif untuk objektivitas dan metodologinya,<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> tetapi menuai kritik luas karena gagal menyesuaikan dengan ukuran institusi, sehingga institusi pendidikan yang lebih besar cenderung menempati peringkat di atas yang lebih kecil.<ref name="edmont" /><ref name="EU">{{cite web|url=http://lajeunepolitique.com/2013/08/29/shanghai-academic-ranking-a-french-controversy/ |title="Shanghai Academic Ranking: a French Controversy" by Marc Goetzmann, for ''La Jeune Politique'' |publisher=Lajeunepolitique.com |date=29 August 2013 |access-date=9 June 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150109003645/http://lajeunepolitique.com/2013/08/29/shanghai-academic-ranking-a-french-controversy/ |archive-date=9 January 2015 }}</ref><ref name="HEPI">{{cite web|url=http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hepi_International-university-rankings-For-good-or-for-ill-REPORT-89-10_12_16_Screen.pdf|title=International university rankings: For good or ill?|author=Bahram Bekhradnia |publisher=Higher Education Policy Institute|date=15 December 2016|access-date=10 June 2017|quote =ARWU presents a further data issue. Whereas in the case of the other rankings the results are adjusted to take account of the size of institutions, hardly any such adjustment is made by ARWU. So there is a distortion in favour of large institutions. If two institutions were to merge, the very fact of merger would mean that the merged institution would do nearly twice as well as either of the individual institutions prior to merger, although nothing else had changed.|page=16}}</ref> |
||
== Peringkat global == |
== Peringkat global == |
||
Baris 20: | Baris 20: | ||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|+Metodologi ARWU<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2014.html|title=ARWU – Methodology|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2014|access-date=30 January 2015}}</ref> |
|+Metodologi ARWU<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2014.html|title=ARWU – Methodology|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2014|access-date=30 January 2015|archive-date=2021-05-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210522122754/http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2014.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Kriteria!! Indikator !! Kode!! Persentase!! Sumber |
! Kriteria!! Indikator !! Kode!! Persentase!! Sumber |
||
Baris 511: | Baris 511: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|+Peringkat Alternatif (500) ~ 10 Besar{{#tag:ref||group=Cat|name=dua}} |
|+Peringkat Alternatif (500) ~ 10 Besar{{#tag:ref||group=Cat|name=dua}} |
||
! Institusi !! 2014<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2014.html|title=Alternative Ranking 2014 ( Excluding Award Factor ) ( Excluding Award Factor )|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2014|access-date=30 January 2015}}</ref> !! 2015<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2015.html|title=Alternative Ranking 2015 ( Excluding Award Factor )|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2015|access-date=4 September 2015}}</ref> |
! Institusi !! 2014<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2014.html|title=Alternative Ranking 2014 ( Excluding Award Factor ) ( Excluding Award Factor )|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2014|access-date=30 January 2015|archive-date=2021-05-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210522123130/http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2014.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref> !! 2015<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2015.html|title=Alternative Ranking 2015 ( Excluding Award Factor )|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2015|access-date=4 September 2015|archive-date=2018-02-24|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180224161524/http://www.shanghairanking.com/Alternative_Ranking_Excluding_Award_Factor/Excluding_Award_Factor2015.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Universitas Harvard]]||1||1 |
| {{flagicon|USA}} [[Universitas Harvard]]||1||1 |
||
Baris 574: | Baris 574: | ||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|+Metodologi Peringkat Tiongkok Raya<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater-China-Ranking-Methodology-2014.html|title=Greater China Ranking – Methodology|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2014|access-date=31 January 2015}}</ref>{{#tag:ref||group=Cat|name=dua}} |
|+Metodologi Peringkat Tiongkok Raya<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater-China-Ranking-Methodology-2014.html|title=Greater China Ranking – Methodology|publisher=Shanghai Ranking Consultancy|date=2014|access-date=31 January 2015|archive-date=2021-05-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210522123212/http://www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater-China-Ranking-Methodology-2014.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref>{{#tag:ref||group=Cat|name=dua}} |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Kriteria!! Indikator !! Persentase |
! Kriteria!! Indikator !! Persentase |
||
Baris 614: | Baris 614: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|+Peringkat Tiongkok Raya (100) ~ 10 Besar{{#tag:ref||group=Cat|name=dua}} |
|+Peringkat Tiongkok Raya (100) ~ 10 Besar{{#tag:ref||group=Cat|name=dua}} |
||
! Institusi !! 2011 !! 2012!! 2013 !! 2014 !! 2015 !! 2016 !! 2017 !! 2018 !! 2019<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China - 2019|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater_China_Ranking2019.html|website=www.shanghairanking.com|access-date=2020-05-06}}</ref> |
! Institusi !! 2011 !! 2012!! 2013 !! 2014 !! 2015 !! 2016 !! 2017 !! 2018 !! 2019<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China - 2019|url=http://www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater_China_Ranking2019.html|website=www.shanghairanking.com|access-date=2020-05-06|archive-date=2020-05-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200501110913/http://www.shanghairanking.com/Greater_China_Ranking/Greater_China_Ranking2019.html|dead-url=yes}}</ref> |
||
! 2020<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China - 2020|url=https://www.shanghairanking.cn/rankings/rtugc/2020|website=www.shanghairanking.com|access-date=2021-06-11}}</ref> |
! 2020<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China - 2020|url=https://www.shanghairanking.cn/rankings/rtugc/2020|website=www.shanghairanking.com|access-date=2021-06-11}}</ref> |
||
|- |
|- |
Revisi per 26 Maret 2022 21.21
Kategori | Pendidikan tinggi |
---|---|
Frekuensi | Tahunan |
Penerbit | Shanghai Ranking Consultancy (2009~sekarang) Universitas Jiao Tong Shanghai (2003~2008) |
Negara | Tiongkok |
Bahasa | Sepuluh bahasa termasuk bahasa Inggris & mandarin |
Situs web | www |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1b/Academic_Ranking_of_World_Universities.png/262px-Academic_Ranking_of_World_Universities.png)
Peringkat Akademik Universitas Dunia atau Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), sering juga disebut Peringkat Shanghai (Shanghai Ranking), adalah salah satu publikasi tahunan peringkat universitas dunia. Daftar peringkat ARWU pada awalnya disusun dan dikeluarkan oleh Universitas Jiao Tong Shanghai pada tahun 2003, menjadikannya sebagai daftar peringkat universitas global pertama dengan berbagai indikator.[1][2]
Sejak 2009, daftar peringkat ARWU telah diterbitkan setiap tahunnya dan dilindungi hak cipta oleh Shanghai Ranking Consultancy, sebuah organisasi yang berfokus pada pendidikan tinggi dan secara hukum tidak tunduk serta tidak terikat kepada universitas atau lembaga pemerintah mana pun.[3] Pada tahun 2011, dewan penasihat internasional yang terdiri dari para sarjana dan peneliti kebijakan dibentuk untuk memberikan saran.[4][5] Daftar ARWU saat ini mencakup daftar peringkat institusi pendidikan tinggi global secara keseluruhan dan untuk pilihan mata pelajaran individu, selain itu ada juga daftar "Peringkat Tiongkok Raya" dan "Peringkat HEI Makedonia" regional independen.
ARWU dianggap sebagai salah satu dari tiga pemeringkat universitas yang paling berpengaruh dan diamati secara luas, di samping QS World University Rankings dan Times Higher Education World University Rankings.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] ARWU banyak menerima umpan balik positif untuk objektivitas dan metodologinya,[10][11][12] tetapi menuai kritik luas karena gagal menyesuaikan dengan ukuran institusi, sehingga institusi pendidikan yang lebih besar cenderung menempati peringkat di atas yang lebih kecil.[9][13][14]
Peringkat global
Secara keseluruhan
Metodologi
Kriteria | Indikator | Kode | Persentase | Sumber |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kualitas pendidikan | Alumninya menjadi Pemenang Nobel & Medali Fields | alumni | 10% | Situs web resmi Pemenang Nobel & Medali Fields[Cat 1] |
Kualitas fakultas | Staf-nya menjadi Pemenang Nobel & Medali Fields | Award | 20% | Situs web resmi Pemenang Nobel & Medali Fields[Cat 1] |
Peneliti yang sering dikutip dalam 21 kategori subjek yang sangat luas | HiCi | 20% | Survei peneliti yang sering dikutip versi Thomson Reuters[Cat 1] | |
Hasil penelitian | Makalah yang diterbitkan dalam majalah "Nature" dan "Science"[* 1] | N&S | 20% | Indeks kutipan |
Makalah yang diindeks dalam Science Citation Index-expanded dan Social Science Citation Index | PUB | 20% | ||
Kinerja per kapita | Kinerja akademik per kapita sebuah institusi | PCP | 10% | - |
|
Daftar peringkat
Alternatif
Perlu banyak waktu bagi universitas yang sedang naik daun untuk menghasilkan peraih Nobel dan Medali Fields dengan jumlah yang sebanding dengan institusi pendidikan yang sudah lama berdiri, maka ARWU membuat peringkat alternatif dengan mengecualikan faktor penghargaan tersebut untuk memberikan cara lain perbandingan kinerja akademik. Bobot semua faktor lainnya tetap tidak berubah, sehingga total keseluruhan 70%.
Institusi | 2014[17] | 2015[18] |
---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 |
![]() |
2 | 2 |
![]() |
4 | 3 |
![]() |
3 | 4 |
![]() |
5 | 5 |
![]() |
6 | 6 |
![]() |
8 | 7 |
![]() |
7 | 8 |
![]() |
10 | 9 |
![]() |
9 | 10 |
Peringkat regional
Mempertimbangkan perkembangan area tertentu, dua tabel liga regional independen dengan metodologi berbeda diluncurkan - Peringkat Universitas Top di Tiongkok Raya dan Peringkat Universitas Tiongkok Terbaik.
Tiongkok Daratan
Peringkat
Institusi | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021[19] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
![]() |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
![]() |
4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
![]() |
7 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
![]() |
5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
![]() |
6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
![]() |
8 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
![]() |
13 | 12 | 12 | 9 | 9 |
![]() |
16 | 14 | 14 | 11 | 10 |
Tiongkok Raya
Metodologi
Kriteria | Indikator | Persentase |
---|---|---|
Pendidikan | Persentase mahasiswa pascasarjana | 5% |
Persentase mahasiswa non-lokal | 5% | |
Rasio staf akademik dengan mahasiswa | 5% | |
Gelar Doktoral yang diberikan | 10% | |
Alumni menjadi pemenang Nobel & Medali Fields | 10% | |
Riset | Pendapatan penelitian tahunan | 5% |
Makalah di majalah Nature & Science | 10% | |
Makalah di SCIE & SSCI | 10% | |
Paten internasional | 10% | |
Fakultas | Persentase staf akademik dengan gelar doktor | 5% |
Staf-nya menjadi Pemenang Nobel & Medali Fields | 10% | |
Peneliti yang banyak dikutip | 10% | |
Sumber daya | Anggaran tahunan | 5% |
Peringkat
Institusi | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019[21] | 2020[22] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
![]() |
7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
![]() |
10 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
![]() |
9 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
![]() |
15 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
![]() |
16 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 7 |
![]() |
3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
![]() |
18 | 17 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 8 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 9 |
![]() |
4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 10 |
Catatan
- ^ a b c Sumber datum resmi diadopsi oleh ARWU: Nobel Laureate Web, Fields Medalist Web, Thomson Reuters' survey of highly cited researchers & Thomson Reuters' Web of Science.
- ^ a b c d e Daftar peringkat yang ditampilkan sesuai dengan daftar peringkat terbaru.
Referensi
- ^ Pavel, Adina-Petruta (2015). "Global university rankings - a comparative analysis". Procedia Economics and Finance. 26: 54–63. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2
.
- ^ "World university rankings: how much influence do they really have?". The Guardian. 2013. Diakses tanggal 27 January 2015.
The first international rankings, the Academic Ranking of World Universities or Shanghai Rankings
- ^ "About Academic Ranking of World Universities". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2014. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2021-02-28. Diakses tanggal 26 September 2014.
Since 2009 the Academic Ranking of World Universities has been published and copyrighted by ShanghaiRanking Consultancy.
- ^ "Shanghai rankings rattle European universities". ABS-CBN Interactive. 8 December 2010. Diakses tanggal 27 January 2015.
France's higher education minister travelled to Jiaotong University's suburban campus last month to discuss the rankings, the Norwegian education minister came last year and the Danish minister is due to visit next month.; The idea for the rankings was born in 1998, when Beijing decreed China needed several world-leading universities.
- ^ "ARWU International Advisory Board". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2014. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2015-02-11. Diakses tanggal 27 January 2015.
- ^ Network, QS Asia News (2018-03-02). "The history and development of higher education ranking systems - QS WOWNEWS". QS WOWNEWS. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2018-08-21. Diakses tanggal 2018-03-29.
- ^ "About Academic Ranking of World Universities | About ARWU". www.shanghairanking.com. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2021-02-28. Diakses tanggal 2018-03-29.
- ^ Ariel Zirulnick (2010-09-16). "New world university ranking puts Harvard back on top". Christian Science Monitor.
Those two, as well as Shanghai Jiao Tong University, produce the most influential international university rankings out there
- ^ a b Indira Samarasekera & Carl Amrhein. "Top schools don't always get top marks". The Edmonton Journal. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal October 3, 2010.
There are currently three major international rankings that receive widespread commentary: The Academic World Ranking of Universities, the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education Rankings.
- ^ a b Philip G. Altbach (11 November 2010). "The State of the Rankings". Inside Higher Ed. Diakses tanggal 27 January 2015.
The major international rankings have appeared in recent months — the Academic Ranking of World Universities, the QS World University Rankings, and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE).
- ^ a b "Strength and weakness of varsity rankings". NST Online. 2016-09-14. Diakses tanggal 2018-03-29.
- ^ a b Marszal, Andrew (2012-10-04). "University rankings: which world university rankings should we trust?". Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Diakses tanggal 2018-03-29.
- ^ ""Shanghai Academic Ranking: a French Controversy" by Marc Goetzmann, for La Jeune Politique". Lajeunepolitique.com. 29 August 2013. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 9 January 2015. Diakses tanggal 9 June 2014.
- ^ Bahram Bekhradnia (15 December 2016). "International university rankings: For good or ill?" (PDF). Higher Education Policy Institute. hlm. 16. Diakses tanggal 10 June 2017.
ARWU presents a further data issue. Whereas in the case of the other rankings the results are adjusted to take account of the size of institutions, hardly any such adjustment is made by ARWU. So there is a distortion in favour of large institutions. If two institutions were to merge, the very fact of merger would mean that the merged institution would do nearly twice as well as either of the individual institutions prior to merger, although nothing else had changed.
- ^ "ARWU – Methodology". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2014. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2021-05-22. Diakses tanggal 30 January 2015.
- ^ "ARWU World University Rankings 2019 | Academic Ranking of World Universities 2019 | Top 1000 universities | Shanghai Ranking - 2019". www.shanghairanking.com. Diakses tanggal 2020-04-14.
- ^ "Alternative Ranking 2014 ( Excluding Award Factor ) ( Excluding Award Factor )". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2014. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2021-05-22. Diakses tanggal 30 January 2015.
- ^ "Alternative Ranking 2015 ( Excluding Award Factor )". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2015. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2018-02-24. Diakses tanggal 4 September 2015.
- ^ "中国大学排名". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2021. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2021-04-28. Diakses tanggal 2021-06-10.
- ^ "Greater China Ranking – Methodology". Shanghai Ranking Consultancy. 2014. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2021-05-22. Diakses tanggal 31 January 2015.
- ^ "Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China - 2019". www.shanghairanking.com. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 2020-05-01. Diakses tanggal 2020-05-06.
- ^ "Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China - 2020". www.shanghairanking.com. Diakses tanggal 2021-06-11.