7Q5: Perbedaan antara revisi
JohnThorne (bicara | kontrib) ←Membuat halaman berisi 'thumb|right|Keseluruhan fragmen 5 dari Gua 7 Komunitas Qumran '''7Q5''' adalah kode untuk sepotong fragmen papirus di antara Naskah Laut Mati ya...' |
JohnThorne (bicara | kontrib) Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
||
| Baris 32: | Baris 32: | ||
}}. "Secara umum, tesis O'Callaghan disambut dengan skeptik karena fragmen ini kecil dan hampir tak terbaca, dan sulit dicocokkan dengan versi Injil Markus yang ada." |
}}. "Secara umum, tesis O'Callaghan disambut dengan skeptik karena fragmen ini kecil dan hampir tak terbaca, dan sulit dicocokkan dengan versi Injil Markus yang ada." |
||
</ref><ref>"... Qumran ms. 7Q5 ... is captioned as if it contains a fragment of Mark: it was of course O’Callaghan who made that controversial — and now virtually universally rejected - identication of this Dead Sea text as a piece of the New Testament ..." Elliot (2004), JK, ''Book Notes'', Novum Testamentum, Volume 45, Number 2, 2003 , pp. 203.</ref><ref>Gundry(1999), p.698</ref> |
</ref><ref>"... Qumran ms. 7Q5 ... is captioned as if it contains a fragment of Mark: it was of course O’Callaghan who made that controversial — and now virtually universally rejected - identication of this Dead Sea text as a piece of the New Testament ..." Elliot (2004), JK, ''Book Notes'', Novum Testamentum, Volume 45, Number 2, 2003 , pp. 203.</ref><ref>Gundry(1999), p.698</ref> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
==Identifikasi O'Callaghan== |
==Identifikasi O'Callaghan== |
||
Teks bahasa Yunani dari {{Alkitab|Markus 6:52-53}}, dengan huruf tebal menunjukkan yang bisa dibaca dari fragmen 7Q5:<ref> |
Teks bahasa Yunani dari {{Alkitab|Markus 6:52-53}}, dengan huruf tebal menunjukkan yang bisa dibaca dari fragmen 7Q5:<ref> |
||
| Baris 59: | Baris 59: | ||
θοντων αυτων εκ του πλοιου ευθυς <br> |
θοντων αυτων εκ του πλοιου ευθυς <br> |
||
επιγνοντες αυτον. |
επιγνοντες αυτον. |
||
| ⚫ | |||
for they did not <br> |
for they did not <br> |
||
understand '''c'''oncerning the loaves <br> |
understand '''c'''oncerning the loaves <br> |
||
Revisi per 6 November 2011 02.36
7Q5 adalah kode untuk sepotong fragmen papirus di antara Naskah Laut Mati yang ditemukan di gua ke-7 komunitas Qumran. Menurut Romo Jose O´Callaghan dalam karyanya ¿Papiros neotestamentarios en la cueva 7 de Qumrân? ("Papirus Perjanjian Baru di gua 7, Qumran?") tahun 1972 merupakan potongan dari Markus 6:52–53. Karyanya kemudian dikembangkan oleh pakar Jerman, Carsten Peter Thiede dalam karyanya The Earliest Gospel Manuscript? ("Naskah Injil Tertua?") tahun 1982. Mayoritas pakar tidak yakin akan pendapat O'Callaghan dan Thiede.[1][2][3][4]
Identifikasi O'Callaghan
Teks bahasa Yunani dari Markus 6:52–53, dengan huruf tebal menunjukkan yang bisa dibaca dari fragmen 7Q5:[5]
ου γαρ
συνηκαν επι τοις αρτοις,
αλλ ην αυτων η καρδια πεπωρω-
μενη. και διαπερασαντες [επι την γην]
ηλθον εις γεννησαρετ και
προσωρμισθησαν. και εξελ-
θοντων αυτων εκ του πλοιου ευθυς
επιγνοντες αυτον.
}} quoted at Cox, Stephen L. (2007). Harmony of the Gospels. Broadman & Holman. hlm. 252. ISBN 0-8054-9444-8.
</ref>
- As the lines of a column are always more or less of the same length, it must be assumed that the words επι την γην <epi ten gen> ("to the land") were omitted, a variant which is not attested elsewhere.[6]
- The identification of the last letter in line 2 with nu has been strongly disputed because it does not fit into the pattern of this Greek letter as it is clearly written in line 4.[7]
- The computer search performed by Thiede assumed that all the disputed letter identifications made by O'Callaghan were correct. However, a similar search performed by scholar Daniel Wallace, but allowing other possible identifications for the disputed letters, found sixteen matches.[6] If a computer search is performed with the undisputed letters of the fragment 7Q5 it will not find the text Mk 6,52-53, because the undisputed letter τ in line 3 does not fit to this text.[8]
Significance
If 7Q5 were identified as Mark 6:52-53 and was deposited in the cave at Qumran by 68 AD, it would become the earliest known fragment of the New Testament, predating P52 by at least some if not many decades.
Since the amount of text in the manuscript is so small, even a confirmation of 7Q5 as Markan "might mean nothing more than that the contents of these few verses were already formalized, not necessarily that there was a manuscript of Mark's Gospel on hand".[9] Since the entirety of the find in Cave 7 consists of fragments in Greek, it is possible that the contents of this cave are of a separate "Hellenized" library than the Hebrew texts found in the other caves. Additionally, as Robert Eisenman points out: "Most scholars agree that the scrolls were deposited in the cave in or around 68 AD, but often mistake this date...for the terminus ad quem for the deposit of the scrolls in the caves/cessation of Jewish habitation at the site, when it cannot be considered anything but the terminus a quo for both of these, i.e., not the latest but the earliest possible date for such a deposit and/or Jewish abandonment of the site. The actual terminus ad quem for both of these events, however difficult it may be to accept at first, is 136 AD."(italics his)[10]. So, for this is long after the currently accepted date range for the composition of Mark, according to Eisenman this would mean the even if it could be proved that 7Q5 is a Mark's fragment, an earlier composition date for the gospel could not be proved. However, Eisenman's objection can be con confuted on paleographical grounds; in fact, the fragment has been analysed and dated paleographically, and the upper limit of its date is 50 AD[11]. -->
Lihat pula
Referensi
- ^
Millard, A. R. (2000). Reading and Writing in the Time of Jesus. NYU Press. hlm. 56. ISBN 0-8147-5637-9.
C.P. Thiede drew on papyrology, statistics and forensic microscopy to try to prove O'Callaghan's case, yet without convincing the majority of leading specialists.
- ^ McCready, Wayne O. (1997). "The Historical Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls". Dalam Arnal, William E.; Desjardins, Michael. Whose Historical Jesus?. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. hlm. 193. ISBN 0-88920-295-8.. "Secara umum, tesis O'Callaghan disambut dengan skeptik karena fragmen ini kecil dan hampir tak terbaca, dan sulit dicocokkan dengan versi Injil Markus yang ada."
- ^ "... Qumran ms. 7Q5 ... is captioned as if it contains a fragment of Mark: it was of course O’Callaghan who made that controversial — and now virtually universally rejected - identication of this Dead Sea text as a piece of the New Testament ..." Elliot (2004), JK, Book Notes, Novum Testamentum, Volume 45, Number 2, 2003 , pp. 203.
- ^ Gundry(1999), p.698
- ^ VanderKam, James (2004). The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls : Their Significance for Understanding the Bible, Judaism, Jesus, and Christianity (edisi ke-First HarperCollins paperback). New York: HarperCollins. hlm. 315. ISBN 0-06-068465-8.
- ^ a b Kesalahan pengutipan: Tag
<ref>tidak sah; tidak ditemukan teks untuk ref bernamawallace - ^ Gundry (1999)
- ^ See Wallace, footnote 18.
- ^ Picirilli, Robert E. (2003). The Gospel of Mark (edisi ke-first). Nashville, TN: Randall House Publications. hlm. 11. ISBN 0-89265-500-3.
- ^ Eisenman, Robert (1996). The Dead Sea Scrolls and the First Christians. Rockport, MA: Element Books, Inc. hlm. 129–30. ISBN 1-85230-785-4.
- ^ [1]. Alan Johnson: "Why all the furor? What is at stake? A number of things: (1) If this identification is correct, it would be the earliest NT MS by some 50-100 years;8 (2) on paleographical grounds, since the upper limit of its date is 50 CE, this would put Mark in the 40’s at the latest"
- Gundry, Robert H. (1999). "No NU in Line 2 of 7Q5: A Final Disidentification of 7Q5 With Mark 6:52-53". Journal of Biblical Literature. The Society of Biblical Literature. 118 (4): 698–707. doi:10.2307/3268112. JSTOR 3268112.
- Thiede, Carsten Peter (1992). The Earliest Gospel Manuscript?: the Qumran Papyrus 7Q5 and its Significance for New Testament Studies. Exeter: Paternoster Press. ISBN 0-85364-507-8.
Pustaka tambahan
- Enste(2000), Stefan: Kein Markustext in Qumran. Eine Untersuchung der These: Qumran-Fragment 7Q5 = Mk 6,52-53, Freiburg/Göttingen 2000 (NTOA 45).
- Estrada, David and White, Jr., William: The First New Testament, Nashville/Thomas Nelson Inc. 1978, ISBN 0-8407-5121-4.