Pengguna:Dedhert.Jr/Uji halaman 18

Wikipedia bukanlah buku petunjuk, buku panduan, buku cetak, atau jurnal ilmiah

Wikipedia bukanlah buku memasak

Wikipedia adalah sumber ensiklopedia, bukan merupakan buku petunjuk, buku pnduan, atau buku cetak. Artikel Wikipedia seharusnya tidak dibaca seperti:

1. Buku panduan dan buku memasak. Ketika Wikipedia menjelaskan tentang tokoh, tempat, atau benda-benda lain, artikel tidak harus dibaca seperti gaya panduan seperti panduan pengguna, buku memasak, kolom saran atau kotak saran. Dengan kata lain, isi artikel Wikipedia tidak meliputi tutorial, panduan pengguna, panduan permainan, dan panduan dalam membuat resep. Selain itu, menjelaskan kepada para pembaca tentang bagaimana cara tokoh atau benda-benda menggunakan atau melakukan sesuatu adalah dikatakan ensiklopedia, sedangkan memberikan instruksi kepada pembaca dalam bentuk modus imperatif tentang bagaiman cara menggunakan atau melakukan sesuatu tidak dikatakan sebagai ensiklopedia. Panduan-panduan tersebut dapat diperbolehkan bila ditulis di Wikibuku.
2. Petunjuk perjalanan. An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. While travel guides for a city will often mention distant attractions, a Wikipedia article for a city should list only those that are actually in the city. If you do wish to help write a travel guide, your contributions would be more than welcome at our sister project, Wikivoyage.
3. Petunjuk permainan. An article about a game should briefly summarize the story and the main actions the player performs in the game. Avoid lists of gameplay concepts and items unless these are notable as discussed in secondary sources in their own right in gaming context (such as the BFG from the Doom series). A concise summary of gameplay details (specific point values, achievements, time-limits, levels, types of enemies, etc.) is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry, but walk-throughs and detailed coverage are not. See also WP:WAF and WP:VGSCOPE. As of a 2021 decision to start allowing them, such guides may be welcome at Wikibooks instead.
4. Petunjuk internet. Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should also describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be kept significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources, since editors can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known. See the Current events portal for examples.
5. Pertanyaan yang sering ditanyakan. Artikel Wikipedia bukan tempat untuk menulis pertanyaan yang sering ditanyakan. Instead, format the information as neutral prose within the appropriate article(s).
6. Buku cetak dan teks anotasi. The purpose of Wikipedia is to summarize accepted knowledge, not to teach subject matter. Articles should not read like textbooks, with leading questions and systematic problem solutions as examples. These belong on our sister projects, such as Wikibooks, Wikisource, and Wikiversity. However, examples intended to inform rather than to instruct, may be appropriate for inclusion in a Wikipedia article.
7. Jurnal ilmiah. A Wikipedia article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well-versed in the topic's field. Introductory language in the lead (and sometimes the initial sections) of the article should be written in plain terms and concepts that can be understood by any literate reader of Wikipedia without any knowledge in the given field before advancing to more detailed explanations of the topic. While wikilinks should be provided for advanced terms and concepts in that field, articles should be written on the assumption that the reader will not or cannot follow these links, instead attempting to infer their meaning from the text. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking.
8. Bahasa akademik. Texts should be written for everyday readers, not just for academics. Article titles should reflect common usage, not academic terminology, whenever possible. Academic language in the text should be explained in lay terms.
9. Case studies. Many topics are based on the relationship of factor X to factor Y, resulting in one or more full articles. For example, this could refer to situation X in location Y, or version X of item Y. This is perfectly acceptable when the two variables put together represent some culturally significant phenomenon or some otherwise notable interest. Often, separate articles are needed for a subject within a range of different countries, due to substantial differences across international borders; articles such as "Slate industry in Wales" are fitting examples. Writing about "Oak trees in North Carolina" or "Blue trucks", however, would likely constitute a POV fork or original research, and would certainly not result in an encyclopedic article.